TRANSLATE THIS PAGE INTO ANY LANGUAGE
EXISTENCE OF GOD
When we speak of the nature of God, one thing
we all must admit.
We are in forced to rely upon something called faith.
I have attended services of all kinds, I have attended meetings,
seen television programs.
But in every case where God is concerned, the bottom line is faith.
No one, in two thousand years of western recorded religion,
has proved one thing.
God loves you. God expects this or that, and this or
that is going to happen.
Again. no one has proof of anything.
THE NEW AGE
Then we try New Age.
That is more peaceful I admit.
It is more nature centered, I admit.
But I find a problem.
New Age people have a thing for writing paragraph
after paragraph of ramblings about spiritual entities,
light, comets, and beings, and wind up leaving you in
the same place as the original people.
There is no proof.
They all reach the same conclusion.
Their conclusion is:
Maybe all of this stuff is right, maybe its wrong,
but in any case I can't do anything about it so I will go
through the motions and whatever will be will be.
But here at Hidden Meanings, I began to look again
at the Bible, at Buddha, at Krishna and the Bhagavad Gita.
I studied Allah with Ahmed Hulusi.
And though there was a lot of interesting stuff,
we were still left to go home and think, maybe
I learned about how other people believe.
But there is no proof.
Nobody can prove God exists, nobody can prove
Jesus ever existed.
Nobody can prove that one thing in
the Bible ever happened.
But you get in trouble if you question it
so nobody says anything.
Its our faith.
Even the politicians are arguing about it.
Something that nobody knows even exists and
its a big deal in politics.
My revolution in this life was based on my need
not to follow other people unless they could
substantiate what they were telling me.
Don't tell me something is very important if you cannot
prove what you're saying.
At least give me a neutral source to back up what you say.
I don't want you to refer me to religious books to back
up your religious claims.
I don't want you to refer me to New Age books or people
to agree with your New Age claims.
If your claims are true then you should be able to back
them up using Neutral Sources who are not religious or new age.
Either it is or it isn't.
Unfortunately in our culture many people believe what is,
is what they wish it to be.
So we start from a premise that there are physical
animals and there is a planet earth.
We can prove that because there you are, here I am,
and we have cats and dogs.
We proved that.
That was pretty easy.
There are physical animals and there
is the planet earth.
THERE ARE STARS AND PLANETS
The next thing we have to do in our search
to prove God etc, is prove that there is a universe for
this planet earth, and us to fly around on.
We can see the sun, we can see the moon,
we can see the constellations, and other planets,
so there is no doubt about it.
There is a planet earth, there is physical life walking
around the earth and there is a universe.
We have proved that.
GOD ---- ANGELS
Now things start to get tacky.
God, angels, devils, UFO’s, aliens.
We start to tred in areas where there is absolutely
no physical proof of any kind.
People say they saw this or that, but cannot prove a thing.
So now we have to back off a bit don't we?
Because our proof is going to have to be more
circumstantial then physical.
What I mean by that is, we are suggesting that something that
was part of a culture or written by someone thousands of
years ago actually refers to something that can be proven
by the things that exist on the earth today or in the cosmos.
THE EVIDENCE ?
Because all we have for proof is the existence
of the earth, and physical life, and the universe.
We have to begin to examine things under a microscope.
We have to spread out a jig saw puzzle and see if things fit.
It takes a lot of effort.
But our goal is to develop proof for what is.
Nothing anyone ever said in the past matters unless
there is proof to support what they say.
So whatever I say is simply an opinion until there is proof.
And if it is just an opinion, your no better off there then
in any other church or new age place.
More ramblings on with no proof of anything.
DO SCRIPTURES MEAN ANYTHING ?
We take all of the old texts of the Bible, Krishna, Buddha,
Mohammed etc and say,
is any of this stuff relevant to anything?
Is there anything in it that can be proven?
The answer is no.
It is subject to interpretation.
Whatever the reader thinks it means is what it means
to that reader, but it does not prove anything.
On the other hand you can't simply discount those texts
because nothing has been proven up to now.
You have to rethink how you are using the text and say,
well maybe it means something that can be proven.
Let me give you an example of a Biblical text that says
that you can prove spiritual things by looking at other
things that are physical
Romans1:20 For the invisible things of him from the creation
of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things
that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead;
so that they are without excuse
There is a religious document that says that the invisible
things of God can be understood by looking at physical things.
Is this true ?
Can we prove this ?.
Well no one ever has, but none the less.
Its worth a shot.
But since we need some guidance , and since no one on
the earth has proven anything about God etc.
Where do we go for guidance.?
We have to take from things written by others whose
credentials can be proved by matching what they say
with things that we can see now.
In other words, we will follow the Bible and see if we
can prove things by finding physical things to back
up ancient words.
That's ok, but we live in a sophisticated society of computers,
and atomic energy, so how can we listen to people who wrote
when there was no electric lights, no cars,
no computers, no planes.
How could they possibly tell us anything ,and if they do ,
why should we even consider what they say?
WOMEN MADE OF
SPARE RIBS ?
There's a story of God (whatever that is)
removing a rib from Adam.
I certainly can not prove that.
Unless the words mean something else.
If this is a kind of mythology in which the words mean
something else then maybe we can do something with it.
The Bible says God speaks in parables, it says that wisdom
is understanding the words of the wise and their dark sayings.
It says the Old Testament is allegorical and it says you
should not be a minister of the letter.
Let's try it and not take all of this stuff literally
and see what happens.
See if we can prove anything.
God takes a rib out of Adam.
Lets say Adam is Atom.
Ok God takes something out of an atom and uses
it to make something called Eve, a female.
You know what?
We got somewhere.
Because, I can prove that.
Here we take an atom.
Remove an electron and make a positive ion.
Then we place that electron in another atom
and make a negative ion.
We have created positive and negative, male and female.
We have proof that if not taken literally, the fact in
the Bible was correct.
And something else.
Whoever wrote that knew of nuclear fission, ionic exchange
long before their time.
We can prove that removing an electron from one atom
and placing it in another causes the result that the Bible speaks of.
Since we have looked at physical things and saw how they work,
and connected them to spiritual or Biblical things we have then
followed the Biblical instructions for finding proof haven't we?
Romans1:20 For the invisible things of him from the creation
of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made,
even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse
We understand the Biblical thing by proving it as a scientific thing,
and it makes us also consider the intelligence of the writer
as one who was very advanced.
LET'S TRY THE SPEED OF LIGHT
In Numbers 2:9 it says that Judah had
186,400 people in its camp.
Judah is referred to in the Bible as the people of light.
186,400 is the constant speed of light.
What have we proved.
We have proved that in speaking of light, the Bible may very
well have been speaking of cosmic or interstellar light
because the interstellar speed is specified.
It could be a coincidence.
But since light and 186,400 are so specific
I think we should give the benefit of the doubt.
The writer was someone who evidently
knew the speed of light.
THE TEMPLE ON YOUR SHOULDERS
The scripture says:
God lives in a temple not made with hands.
On the side of the human head is a place called the temple.
So let's consider the human head as the temple
The Biblical temple has an outer room, and inner holy of holies,
and the two are separated by a curtain or veil.
The human head has an outer covering of the brain called dura mater,
the inner most sensitive is called pia mater,
and the two are separated by arachnoid which is
the web or veil or curtain.
We have an anatomically correct description of a human brain
written thousands of years ago in the Bible.
By not taking it literally, we have proven it correct.
And what about the writer?
How did the writer know of this so many thousands of years ago ?
ALL THIS STUFF ??
It seems we have followed a pattern of considering
ancient writers as being an advanced race,
and their statements showing links between the physical
and the astronomical as being scientifically correct.
If an advanced race was writing this material
and they spoke of cosmic events,
they would obviously know what they are talking about,
I would think.
Someone who spoke of nuclear fission,
the speed of light,
the construction of the human brain, thousands of years ago,
would seem to be beingsof exceptional knowledge at
a time when there was none.
THE FLYING HORSEAND THE HUMAN HEAD
When they spoke of a special happening in Revelation
it was connected with the white horse in the sky.
It means Pegasus who is the white horse in the sky.
Then found circumstantial proof developed as the first planet
orbiting its own star was found in Pegasus.
Then taking it a step further we found that Pegasus
in the sky was the same as the Hippocampus of the
brain which is responsible for memory.
Pegasus was a white horse whose father was Poseidon,
God of the Sea, making Pegasus a white sea horse.
Pegasus kicked the fountain on Mt. Hippocrene and became
sacred to the Goddess of Memory.
In the Brain is an organ called the hippocampus.
The word hippocampus means sea horse and
Stedmans Medical Dictionary says it is white in color.
The hippocampus is responsible for memory.
Someone in ancient times connected Pegasus with memory.
And then someone named the organ of the brain responsible
for memory as a white sea horse, hippocampus.
There is a hippocampus, there is a Pegasus and they
are both connected to memory .
Thus by looking at the physical we proved the Biblical
I feel that we have accumulated enough circumstantial
evidence in comparing contemporary science with ancient Biblical
texts to conclude that scriptures were influenced by an intelligence
Does that suggest proof of God?
If You Can Donate, Or For DVD's, Flash Drives, Or E Books Click Here
TO RETURN TO THE HIDDEN MEANINGS HOME PAGE CLICK HERE
Non Profit Org. Under New Age Christian Village Church AKA Hidden Meanings